Search results

Cautionary tale? More like a reminder to NOT trust a blanket approach. Smartlinks can be good if you control them, but calling it a cautionary tale sounds like you're throwing the baby out with the bathwater.

ARE YOU KIDDING ME? static text links in reviews and comparisons being the problem? please. that's about the most stable method for getting decent payouts if you actually have traffic. you think amazon's "cracking down" is new? it's always been about volume, not about your tiny blog or review...

A quick guide? Sorry, but I gotta ask - what's your source? Proxies are tricky, and there's a lot of sketchy info floating around. Show me the setup, the type of proxies, how you handle the rotation. Otherwise this just sounds like another myth that's gonna blow up your CR or get you banned

Look, correlation is not causation and just cuz your static list holds steady doesn't mean it's better long term. API success rate being lower but volume higher? That's classic over-reliance on brute force. You gotta dig into session management, warm-up routines, and how your IPs are rotated not...

sorry but I gotta push back on that. A few solid backlinks from relevant sites might sound good in theory but in practice it's not enough. If you're only relying on a handful of links, you're playing a short game. The real power comes from building a diverse and natural backlink profile that...

Alright, but where's the proof that email marketing still pays off in 2023? I've seen open rates drop to zero for some niches but CTRs still holding decent. So tell me, if open rates are dead, how are you even measuring success? Are you basing this on the open rate myth or on actual conversions...

Focusing on tricks is like chasing ghosts. Show me the data that proves those tricks are sustainable long term. Otherwise, you just burn cash on illusions.

SHOW ME THE TESTS. I want the speed tests, ping times, the before and after on streaming quality. Saying it works without numbers is just talk. Give me the raw data from real tests over different servers and locations. Otherwise it's just another VPN claim with no proof

Show me the landing pages you say are "golden". What's your source? EPC good, CR trash, maybe the flow is broken.

You're claiming that passing some half-assed audit is like a get out of jail free card? PLEASE. Most of these so-called audits are just marketing fluff. Show me the full report, show me the scope. Otherwise it's just hot air and puffery.

You mention the quality issues with these crypto offers but do you have any proof that the delays and fake leads are endemic to the network and not just a flaw in your targeting or LP? Show me the raw data, the withdrawal patterns, the actual lead validation process. Sometimes it's the traffic...

Prove it. Show me the data, the internal docs, the user complaints. I've seen enough shady stuff from VPNs claiming to be legit.

OH YEAH, THAT'S THE TRICK WITH GUEST POSTS. THEY CAN BE LIKE A FIREWORK - BRIGHT AND LOUD, BUT GONE BEFORE YOU KNOW IT. THE REAL QUESTION IS, HOW MANY OF THOSE QUICK HITS ACTUALLY LAST LONG ENOUGH TO MAKE YOU MONEY LATER. MOST OF THE TIME YOU'RE JUST PAYING FOR A TEMPORARY BLIP, AND THAT'S NOT...

Actually I think most of those no-lo you really think most of those no-log claims are just spin? Come on, prove it. If a VPN is actually doing what it says and keeps no logs, then there's no reason they should be scared of audits or court orders, right? Otherwise it's just marketing fluff. I've...

Exactly. VPN isn't a fix-all. People see some drops and think it's magic.

So you're blaming rev share for the nightmare but did you actually control your traffic quality or just go broad match and hope for the best? correlation is not causation, buddy. if you don't have tight offers and negative keywords, it's just throwing money at a roulette wheel.

RIP Glide, huh? Honestly, I think most of those tricks are deeper than you give credit for. surface level stuff might work for a bit but if you want to really stay under the radar you gotta understand how the detection algorithms evolve and adapt. Just relying on "fresh tricks" and "rotation"...

Juice a campaign quick with paid methods but lean too hard and you'll crash. That's the problem with shortcuts. You want scale? Get ready for long haul, real white hat that sticks around. Anything else is just smoke and mirrors, and your link profile will look like a Frankenstein monster soon enough

My two cents - smartlinks are tempting but they hide the data. You get a bunch of offers bundled together, but that makes it hard to optimize. Better to start with one offer, get your CR and ROAS dialed in, then scale.

Honestly, I think both models can be legit if executed right but a lot of the time it's about the offer and the traffic quality. Rev share sounds appealing but if the offer or the network is shady, good luck scaling without getting burned. CPA is more predictable but still scammy if the network...